[by Howard Fencl, Hennes Communications] The second a crisis rears its ugly head and a reporter knocks on your door about it, you start quaking in your boots. You get a lump in your throat and notice you’re sweating. But you know in your heart that your organization is not the villain in this issue, so you want to be proactive and transparent.
You open the door, the reporter sticks a mic in your face and you immediately start answering a question. Then you answer another. And another. Ten or fifteen minutes later, the reporter wraps up and flies out of your office. Your brain races to reconstruct the interview. You start beating yourself up over the things you wish you had said.
What’s wrong with this scenario?
Well, pretty much EVERYTHING. The reporter had complete control over this interview. If you find yourself in this situation, here’s how to tip the scale so you have more control:
Use the other half of that time to think about the tough questions the reporter might ask you. How will you answer them?
When you do this, you set context. Why is that important? Because the easiest thing for a reporter to do is to ask a follow-up question based on the context you have set. When that happens, you begin to control the flow of the interview.
Every time you deliver a message in an interview, you use the power of context to take control.
Make sure you use messages to tell your side of the story. Ultimately, your organization’s reputation is at stake. And as a former colleague famously said, “…the residual odor of a seriously unfavorable story permeates your business environment for a long, long time.” [1]
_____________